Some Issues About the First Instance Court Judgement on the Civil Claim when the Penal Procedure is Terminated on the Grounds of Extinction of Criminal Liability (Reflections on Interpretative Decision No. 1/2013, Criminal College of the Supreme Court of Cassation)
Authors:
Georgi
Mitov
St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, Bulgaria
Pages:
209-
218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54664/CCOR5800
Abstract:
Interpretative Decision No. 1/2013 of the Criminal College of the Supreme Court of Cassation stipulates that “… the court shall render a decision on the civil claim, accepted for joint consideration within the penal procedure, when, in the course of the first instance proceedings, before the verdict is pronounced, any of the grounds under Art. 79(1) of the Bulgarian Criminal Code occurs (death of the perpetrator, expiration of the term of limitation, amnesty)”. This decision of the Criminal College raises complex theoretical and practical questions related to the rules for hearing the civil claim, considering the criminal nature of the proceedings, the functions of the parties, the participation of the perpetrator’s inheritors (where the perpetrator has died), how their rights and legitimate interests will be guaranteed, and other questions that the Interpretative Decision failed to answer. Following an analysis of the established problems, a proposal for their solution is made through official referral of the civil claim to the civil court as to continue the court proceedings after the criminal case has been discontinued.
Keywords:
termination of criminal prosecution; term of limitation; amnesty; death of the perpetrator; civil claim; first instance proceedings; parties of the court procedure.
Download
599 downloads since 21.12.2022 г.
NA