Journal De Jure
“ST. CYRIL AND ST. METHODIUS” UNIVERSITY OF VELIKO TARNOVO - UNIVERSITY PRESS
All Journals De Jure (2017) Vol 8 Issue 1 Article 11

Does the termination of criminal proceedings for a crime, which is under the scope of art. 22, paragraph 1 of the Forfeiture in Favour of the State of Illegally Acquired Assets Act Law, but is outside of the scope of art. 22, paragraph 2 of the Forfeiture in Favour of the State of Illegally Acquired Assets Act, constitute an absolute procedural obstacle for the existence and lawful exercise of the right of claim for forfeiture of illegally acquired property to the state?


Authors:
Nikolay Kolev St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria

Pages: 71-78

Abstract:

This article explores whether the termination of criminal proceedings against the respondent in the application based on Art. 74, par. 1 of the Law on Forfeiture of the State of illegally acquired property is sufficient reason for supersedes case

Keywords:

illegally acquired property, non-conviction based civil confiscation; criminal proceedings.

Download

Does the termination of criminal proceedings for a crime, which is under the scope of art. 22, paragraph 1 of the Forfeiture in Favour of the State of Illegally Acquired Assets Act Law, but is outside of the scope of art. 22, paragraph 2 of the Forfeiture in Favour of the State of Illegally Acquired Assets Act, constitute an absolute procedural obstacle for the existence and lawful exercise of the right of claim for forfeiture of illegally acquired property to the state?

996 downloads since 12.6.2017 г.
NA / Bulgaria / China / Cote D'Ivoire / Cyprus / Europe / France / Germany / Netherlands / Portugal / Romania / Russian Federation / Senegal / Sweden / Turkey / Ukraine / United Kingdom / United States
  • © ST. CYRIL AND ST. METHODIUS UNIVERSITY OF VELIKO TARNOVO 2016 - 2024