Централна Европа и Балканите през ХХ в.: cимволично и политико-географско изследване
Автори:
Даниел
Цитирига
Страници:
352-
358
Резюме:
Since the book of Friederich Naumann, Mitteleuropa was published in Berlin in 1915, historians and political analysts began a very strong debate for a more accurate defining of the concept. Timothy Garton Ash, in his article, Puzzle of Central Europe (1999) is quoting a study appeared in 1954, under Karl Sinnhuber signature. This author compared no less than sixteen definitions of Central Europe, from which it may be concluded than the Iberian Peninsula was the only one not included in this definitions and Austria, Czech and Moravia was the only one‘s which are included in all definitions. In our work- paper we stressed upon the forms used by the most important theorists who analyzed the defining Central Europe versus Balkans item. If for Polish historians as Oskar Halecki and Piotr S. Wandycz the used form is East Central Europe, in the case of French historians the Middle Europe is the concept which are frequently used. The other, as Milan Kundera or Czeslaw Milosz talk about Central Europe. Also, Maria Todorova used balkanization just as concerning a focus-conflicted area. All these definitions and notions which spread in time only show the special attention of which this concept is surround.
Ключови думи:
Central Europe, Balkans, identities, ethnical nations, neighbors
Изтегляне
754 изтегляния от 7.7.2017 г.
Изтегляния по държави
NA (394)
/
Belarus
(1)
/
Belgium
(1)
/
Bulgaria
(8)
/
Canada
(8)
/
China
(14)
/
Cote D'Ivoire
(1)
/
Europe
(1)
/
Finland
(1)
/
France
(3)
/
Germany
(60)
/
Hong Kong
(1)
/
Hungary
(7)
/
India
(21)
/
Ireland
(1)
/
Korea, Republic of
(1)
/
Netherlands
(25)
/
Philippines
(2)
/
Poland
(3)
/
Portugal
(1)
/
Romania
(5)
/
Russian Federation
(32)
/
Slovakia
(3)
/
Sweden
(5)
/
Turkey
(3)
/
Ukraine
(7)
/
United Kingdom
(53)
/
United States
(92)