Ethics, Science, Education implements a double-blind peer review procedure where reviewers and the author remain anonymous. It is the duty of reviewers to assess whether the article contains results that are clearly presented and support the conclusions, whether it contains an appropriate bibliography, and whether it makes a significant contribution to the field.
Reviewers shall undertake to keep all the information about articles confidential and treat it as privileged.
Reviews should be conducted objectively with no personal criticism of the author.
Reviewers must complete their reviews within a specified time frame. Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified to evaluate the manuscript or knows that he/she will not be able to complete the review on time should immediately notify the Editorial Board and decline the invitation, so that other reviewers can be engaged.