STUDIA PHILOLOGICA
“ST. CYRIL AND ST. METHODIUS” UNIVERSITY OF VELIKO TARNOVO - UNIVERSITY PRESS

The Future of English Studies – in Whose Hands?


Authors:
Glyn Hambrook University of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; Complutense de Madrid, Spain

Pages: 475-492
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54664/CETA5337

Abstract:

This essay advocates a change in approach to the study of literatures in English. This would entail a shift from the idea of such literatures as nationally circumscribed autonomous systems or a supra-national linguistic self-sufficient system predicated on an Anglophone cultural community to one that recognises the transnational character of all literature(s), which consequently should be placed, understood and studied in relation to a broader geo-cultural context. Obstacles to this in the English studies academic orthodoxy derive from the hegemonic status of the English language and Anglophone culture. From this position of power derives not only the fallacy of self-sufficiency mentioned previously but also factors that are responsible for a pervasive monoglossia. Key players in bringing about the transition advocated are not only exceptions to these circumstances within Anglophone academia, but also the extensive community of Anglicists from outside the Anglosphere. The latter’s status as speakers of English by acquisition as well as of at least one other language, their “native” tongue, which positions them at once within, but with an external perspective on the Anglosphere, accords them credentials to implement the change advocated – not least because in a sense, by virtue of their situation they are already operating within the transnational, trans-linguistic paradigm advocated.

Keywords:

Anglophone, Anglosphere, comparative literature, “English Studies”, (literary) system, monoglossia, national, transnational

Download


65 downloads since 9.6.2026 г.
NA
  • © ST. CYRIL AND ST. METHODIUS UNIVERSITY OF VELIKO TARNOVO 2016 - 2026